Pages

Showing posts with label Rural. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rural. Show all posts

September 8, 2008

Government, Inflation and Farmers

The recent rise in inflation figures to a record high had made government and the central bank to come out with several policies (fiscal and monetary) to contain the rising inflation. Several commodities were banned from trading in futures trading like, potato, chana, rubber and soya refined oil. Previously, the government had also banned many other commodities like wheat, turmeric and so on. It had a notion that futures trading in agricultural commodities lead to a rise in prices in the spot market and thus, rise in inflation. Though, the committee set up by the government to study this notion (Abhijit Sen Committee) said that it didn’t found any conclusive evidence to prove that trading in futures market lead to rise in the prices of the commodities in the spot market and vice versa. Still, government continued with the ban of certain commodities.

Often, inflation has been projected as a bad for a growing economy. But, a steady and healthy rise in inflation is a must for the fruits of economic development to reach every quarter of the population. There are large sections of people who could benefit from the rising inflation. But, the government ensures that that does not happen. To appease a certain section of population, it sacrifices the benefits that could be received by other section. Whenever inflation figure moves up, government bans export of several food items like wheat and rice or announces some policies that badly affect farmers. It never allows its farmers to benefit from the rising prices. Indian farmers never think of producing good crop and sell it outside to gain more money. They are never allowed the opportunity to cash in. The government primarily does this to appease the urban population and ensure that in the election the ruling party wins by securing more votes from this population. It is irony that more than 60 or 70 per cent of India stay in villages and most of them are engaged in farming activities.

There is Minimum Support Price (MSP) by which a government says that it will buy their produce at a price that is either at the MSP or at a higher price determined by market forces. But, if we look at the past incidents, we will find that it never allows market participants to cash in. There are several blockades like railways refusing to allow them to transport their stocks and so on. Moreover, the MSP is only for big farmers having large produce owing to large lands. In India, barring a few per cent of farmers, others have relatively very small amount of produce. These farmers either sell their produce to an agent or in a market in nearby city. Apart from this, there are huge taxes on export of certain goods so that the farmers sell it in the domestic market just to keep inflation under control. The recent policies of government in certain agri -sector show how government is anti-farmer. It is high time for the government to change its agri-policies. It should learn from global scenario and allow farmers to produce more and find the market for that produce.

The government has also announced a debt waiver to a tune of Rs.70,000 crore for the farmers. But, people are yet to find out what happened to that waiver. The fact is that farmers hardly get the benefit of such waivers and when they get an opportunity to sell their produce at a higher price, government intervenes in the name of inflation. Others enjoy the real benefit. If we look at the farm loans, it presents a dismal picture. Presently, it is mandatory for the domestic scheduled commercial banks, expect regional rural banks (RRB) to allocate 18 per cent of their total loans and advances as well as non-SLR investments towards agriculture sector. Advances to the agriculture sector can be in the form of direct finance or indirect finance. Indirect finance is limited to a maximum of 25 per cent of the specified 18 per cent, i.e. 4.5 per cent of total loans and advances for agriculture sector. So, banks are not suppose to increase their indirect agriculture lending beyond the maximum 25 per cent of their total agriculture advances as priority sector advance. In reality the picture is different. While the public sector banks more or less remain within the prescribed limit, the private sector banks most often are found to breach the maximum 25 per cent as indirect finance. What this means is that poor farmers who genuinely need funds for their seeds and other agriculture expenses are denied loans. Government needs to ensure that all the scheduled commercial banks in India, both public and private do their needful so that these farmers who are the backbone of our country are able to get loans whenever they require. The huge success of micro-finance institutions in different parts of India proves that genuine farmers need genuine access to credit.

There had been a decline in India’s GDP growth for the first quarter in this fiscal year and the projections from various quarters too, is bad. So, government should make sure that at least agriculture sector is not affected by ensuring that farmers get cheap loans on time, making fruits of development reach them, and allowing farmers to cash in with the rising prices. Rising prices can act as motivational factors for increasing acreage and yields.

August 28, 2008

The battlefield of Singur

The problem with India developing with such a pace is that these developments are contained within the city. Poverty has been rising with a much faster pace then ever. The recent report by World Bank shows that poverty has increased more. The natural question is what’s government doing? Well, the answer lies in Singur! The government is busy with finalizing various land deals for various corporate to make their investments. In doing so, the government is forgetting one thing that it is taking fertile land from the farmers. Government has an option to give infertile lands or those lands, which are hardly tilled by farmers to these corporate. But, government pays no heed to poor farmers woe.

In an article in The Hindu Business Line, Ranabir Ray Choudhary rightly describes the present situation of Singur. He says that if the Tata pant meant for Nano production comes up, the entire farm culture in the area will die a slow death and if the greenery spreads across the horizon, the State’s industrial prospects will suffer a near fatal blow.

Mr. Choudhary rightly describes the agony of poor farmers by stating that the babus of Kolkata know that their children will get a computer job after college. But, the fathers of Singur do not know what will happen to their sons once they grow up because there is no land to till anymore. They see no future for their sons. Why would then they think about the future of the children of the Kolkata babus?

What will a farmer do with the money he received? Invest somewhere. He may fail. What after that? With land in hand at least he has a fixed capital. So, the solution lies not in giving monetary support to these farmers. Giving back land would not help. It will have a far larger negative affect on the investments not only in West Bengal but also in other states. There is a mixed feeling about the disputed land if it is returned. Many feel that the land may have become non arable. The solution does not lie in returning the land. The solution lies in rehabilitation. But, past experiences of several governments prove that it is not so easy to rehabilitate about several thousand farmers. Now, the situation seems so tensed that other investors who had any future plans to invest in the state are doing a rethink.

Going by the attitude of Mamta Banerjee it seems that she is not interested in talks but raising voices. Had she been ready to talk with the government, the Singur fiasco would not have crossed the danger line. The Telegraph reports that the government of West Bengal had a proposal to build a market complex to rehabilitate farmers who are unwilling to hand over land in Singur. According to the proposal, finalised and approved by the government, half of the 40 acres of the vested land that is part of the Tata Motors project could be utilised for the market. It would house around 1,500 shops, each measuring 436 sqft. With a township expected to come up, the shops could sell grocery and other commodities for household use.

Change is necessary for development. So, the farmers of Singur will have to live with the fact that they have no option but to give their lands to the government, provided government promises to rehabilitate them.


March 31, 2008

Rural India

Recently, Indian Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh said that he still remembers his old days in rural. There were no proper roads, electricity and sanity. Even schools were situated at a distance. There were many other issues. All these were few decades back.

Now come to this century. People believe most of these issues have been sorted. In fact, most of these problems are not only related to rural but also found in urban area. Let me give some for urban first. Still urban cities in India lack proper loos for public. Recently, the government in Mumbai announced to build many such.

Now come back to rural area. Whenever I visit my village, I face a lot of problems. Mind you this is 21st century. No proper roads. If roads are there they are narrow. Most of them are kuccha road. In some area you may find patches of metallic road. The last time when I saw electricity was in 1997. In those days, it would be there for a few hours in the afternoon. No drinking water facility! Many schools lack loos for the students. This is very important because one of the most important reasons for girls in rural area to discontinue their studies at a later stage is lack of toilet in the schools. Transportation is one other issue that needs to be solved.

It is said that with proper planning everything can be solved. What is planning? (unknown word for politicians). India is growing. No doubt about that. Growth should be for everyone. But here the growth is only for selective.

I believe that this is the best time for India. It is having both prime minister and finance minister of great caliber. I respect their knowledge and their capability. If all these issues can’t be tackled now then, God save us!